Without doing any detailed analysis of functions and elements, all the reading I’ve done has given me a preliminary list of projects to undertake. Here is my first project list:
|Explorations Into Permaculture Projects List|
|Project||Leverage Point Priorities||Importance||Difficulty||Timing|
|Begin growing transplants myself||E||A||1||spring|
|Canning of locally grown produce||E||A||1|
|Monitor energy use using fuel bills and existing meters||C||A||1|
|Plant rye grass for mulch||C||A||2||fall|
|Cherry Tree Guild||C||A||2||fall|
|Purchase Rocket Stove||C||B||1|
|Drying of locally grown produce||C||B||1|
|Bees||C||C||2||must order by February|
|Thermal window Shades – west window||A||A||2|
|Thermal window Shades – north window||A||A||2|
|Thermal window Shades
– east window
|Purchase 2 months extra provisions||A||B||1|
Here is a link to the table as a PDF: project list 081111 for blog. How did I create this?
After listing the projects that are floating around in my head, I assessed the importance and difficulty as discussed in the Evaluation Matrix from Powering Down. They suggest that one asses difficulty using a four point scale (1-4) in this way:
1. A project that we can easily do, resources readily available.
2. A project we can do, but it will take some effort to get the resources.
3. A project we could do, but it would be a serious challenge.
4. A project that for one reason or another is out of reach for the moment.
They suggest the following scale for assessing importance:
A. The project is immediately and obviously useful for us now.
B. The project could be useful given certain changes we expect in the near term.
C. The project might be useful if circumstances were to change significantly.
D. The project is useless or irrelevant to us at this moment.
Finally, I used the A-F rating system to assess the degree of leverage as I detailed in my earlier post, Moving From Pattern to Details part 2. For example:
- Developing a way to grow my own transplants in my zone 1 rather than buying store-bought transplants (grown who knows where) is a way of evolving the system structure, substituting local producers for long distance ones (F).
- Monitoring my energy use and the actions I take to impact my energy use is a way to increase my access to feedback by creating a new feedback loop (C).
- Enhancing my ability to create good compost by adding and harvesting rye grass, strengthens a balancing feedback loop. (C).
- While both storing dried produce and canning increase my available food storage and cut losses of yield (C), canning substitutes a local producer (me) for long distance ones (E, since I already buy quite a bit of canned food).
I created a table in an excel spreadsheet and then sorted the projects based on leverage point priority first, then importance then difficulty to come up with a preliminary sequence to follow. This sequencing strategy is preliminary.
Looking at this I can see how it is easy to come up with projects that have an A and B leverage point rating. Its harder to identify projects with C, D, E and F ratings. They are far less obvious.
P.S. I’m no longer stuck.